Hankook Against Kumho: Korean Brands Go Head-to-Head

Article Image

Hankook and Kumho may both be Korean tyre brands, but the juxtaposition in their market strategy opens up a whole array of differences between the two brands and their tyre collections. While one is a premium brand recognised as an OE (original equipment) supplier for a plethora of vehicle manufacturers, the other boasts affordable tyres for everyday driving.

In this blog, we’re pinpointing the benefits and potential limitations of both, so you know if Korean tyres are worthy of higher investment – or if they should stick to the mid-range market.

Korea’s Position in the Tyre Industry

Believe it or not, Korea is one of the most prolific locations in the world when it comes to tyre manufacturing and production. Its factories and testing facilities lean heavily on the role of innovation and development, with a strong focus on the importance of sustainability in design and production.

As well as Hankook and Kumho, Nexen Tyres is another Korean brand that’s recognised for its quality and precision on the roads and other surfaces, with all three brands spanning passenger car tyres, off-road and SUV tyres, and more commercial models.

Suffice to say, opting for a Korean-based tyre brand delivers tyres backed by research and innovation. But which of the two main players is better for your vehicle?

Hankook Tyres: Pros and Cons

To look first at Hankook Tyres, this is considered the most successful Korean brand in terms of its market status. A premium brand recognised for high-performance and mixed terrain quality and reliability, Hankook sits up amongst the tyre industry leading brand names while still offering affordability and value for money.

Despite its tyres not performing as well in extreme conditions, both the Kinergy and WeatherFlex models offer all-season traction and stability for mixed terrains. It’s this reputation that makes Hankook a go-to OEM brand for several vehicle manufacturers including Audi and BMW, with an eco-centric range of tyres and heavy investment in material and design research.

Article Image

Kumho Tyres: Pros and Cons

Kumho is the cheaper of the two brands, sitting in the middle of the market. These tyres offer reliable performance without the prestige of high-performance features and are built for everyday use which renders them both practical and affordable.

The wide range of tyres from the Kumho brand means that there are plenty of models for drivers to choose from, with some of the most iconic models including the Solus and Ecsta ranges, and the Road Venture AT tyre for all-terrain driving.

Of course, any lower budget brand does have its limitations, with these revolving around the performance and tread life of Kumho tyres, as well as the driving experience if you’re seeking more of a performance fitment. However, what Kumho delivers is everyday precision, reliability, and comfort for drivers.

Which Korean Brand Comes Out on Top?

As ever, the answer to this depends largely on the style of driving you are doing, your vehicle, and what you want to get out of the driving experience. Those living in particularly challenging climates tend to opt for premium tyres that are backed by long-lasting and highly stable tread blocks, while many UK drivers find the versatility of all-season mid-range tyres suitable for commutes and everyday journeys.

Kumho is an ideal brand if what you need is a reliable tyre that balances affordability with comfort and durability. Hankook is the better option for high-performance driving, for advanced technology and leading tyre features, and for enhanced multi-climate navigation. Both are an example, however, of the quality behind Korean tyre design and engineering.

You can browse both collections on the individual brand pages of our website, or get in touch for bespoke advice relating to your specific needs. 

Back to Knowledge Hub